I love the Hall of Fame debate. I could do it all day. In fact, I HAVE done it all day. The beauty of the Hall of Fame is there is no exact science for choosing who deserves enshrinement. If there were, everybody’s ballot would be identical and we’d have nothing but 1st ballot inductees who all collect 100% of the vote. And it goes without saying that 100% of the fun and suspense would vanish as well.
In 2013, the Baseball Writers of America Association (BBWAA)
took all the fun and suspense out of it FOR us, with not a single eligible
candidate collecting the 75% of the vote required for enshrinement. Craig Biggio (68.2%) and Jack Morris (67.7%)
came the closest. Many voters simply “took
a knee” last year, turning in a blank ballot and forfeiting the opportunity to
vote for as many as 10 candidates.
For the past year, I have been trying to figure out that the
writers were trying to prove or solve by shutting the door on Hall of Fame
caliber players that are universally thought to be deserving of the honor. The truth is it ticked me off a little, the thought
of a writer casting a blank ballot with so many candidates worthy of
consideration. Blank? REALLY?
Do the members of the BBWAA have a responsibility to enshrine
players in Cooperstown? I say yes. The National Baseball Hall of Fame is a
museum for baseball fans. It is not
funded by Major League Baseball in any way, but rather by private
contributions. Many of those contributions
come in the form of admission fees and much of that is collected from folks
intending to attend the annual enshrinement ceremony.
The Hall exists for the sole purpose of connecting current
and future generations to the proud, rich history of the game. Fewer people visit when nobody gets in, and
the connection weakens. It is clear that
the BBWAA does the Hall no favors when they fail to elect a single player, but
it can also be argued that they are compounding the damage the Steroid
Era inflicted on the game itself.
Every blank ballot cast, every deserving player asked to wait
another year is a grim reminder that we’re still not past this very dark spot
in the history of this magnificent game.
Measures have been taken to ensure history is not repeated. Baseball is moving on. Time for the high and mighty writers to do
the same.
There are 19 new names on the 2014 ballot, including 4 with
statistical bodies of work that easily pass my Cooperstown “eye test”, none of
whom were the objects of suspicion of steroid or performance enhancing drug
use. These 4 names are going to make it
much harder for a writer to turn in a blank ballot this year:
Tom Glavine:
305 wins over 22 seasons. 10-time
All Star, 2-time Cy Young Award winner.
Won 20 or more 5 times over a 10 season stretch.
Greg Maddux:
355 career wins, 4-time Cy Young Award winner, 5 additional top 5
finishes in Cy Young balloting. 8 time
All Star. One of the greatest
righthanders ever.
Mike Mussina:
270 career wins over 18 seasons, 8 in Yankee pinstripes. Never won the Cy Young Award, but finished in
the top 6 in balloting 9 times over 17 seasons. 30 wins shy of the hallowed 300 number, but
a very good pitcher for a long time.
Frank Thomas:
.301 batting average with 521 home runs over 19 seasons. 2-time Most Valuable Player (1994, 1994),
plus 4 additional appearances in the top 4.
Played just slightly over half of his games as a 1st baseman,
the rest as a DH.
My case for Bonds and
Clemens
For any player who ever used, it is impossible to understand
or calculate what his “arc” of productivity would have been had he not made the
choice to use. Many voters don’t want to
be burdened with such “mathematical gymnastics” and summarily cast aside
literally everybody on the infamous list of PED users. As 2013 balloting taught us, that position
has grown in popularity, and I don’t consider it a thoroughly unreasonable one. So why
Bonds and Clemens then?
As I evaluate a player, I remove from the evaluation any
season where there’s a trail of PED use and any season AFTER that. If you’re not a Hall of Famer before you
start using, you’ll never get my vote after you retire. No matter how productive you are. Even if you only used ONCE. The resume ends the very instant you start
using. Everything stops.
It might sound harsh, but it works both ways: if you’re a Hall of Famer before you started
with PEDs, you’ll have my vote at the end, no matter how much you used, no
matter for how long. The Hall is for the
players who performed the best (without being caught cheating) in their
respective eras.
Next to Bonds, the case for Roger Clemens is a bit harder to
make in my opinion, but his stretch with the Red Sox (again, before he
reportedly started using) was pure dominance: an MVP Award, 3 Cy Youngs, 3 more
top 6 finishes before he left Boston. I
don’t have any video, but I am reasonably sure that he extended his career with
something illegal. With that said, there is no evidence to suggest that Clemens
wasn’t clean in a Red Sox uniform, and he was an incredible pitcher in his
Boston years.
Reasonable arguments both, but two of the most dominant
players of their respective eras will be left out forever because, well, you know
why.
What about Pete Rose?
Most folks who call themselves baseball fans have an opinion
on this guy, and now that you know where I sit on Bonds and Clemens, my opinion
on Charlie Hustle should not surprise you.
Listing his statistical credentials is pointless because everybody
agrees that Pete’s body of work is worthy of Cooperstown.
He is not in the Hall because Commissioner A.
Bartlett Giamatti banned him from baseball for life and the National Baseball
Hall of Fame honored the suspension (although not obligated to do so in any
way). There is ongoing debate because
there are many who agree that betting on the Reds during his managerial years cancels
all of that out. I do not hold that
opinion. Somewhere in the middle of 4,256
knocks, a staggering number that may never be equaled, Pete punched his ticket
to Cooperstown. When future generations visit the Hall of Fame, they should be able to learn about Pete and the way he played, because it is how baseball SHOULD be played.
Outlook for 2014 Voting
+ WJR’S Ballot
In shutting the doors to everybody on the 2013 ballot, the
writers were making a point, but my theory is that it was also a metaphorical
“reset button” and the dawn of new mindset for voting. Look for the vote totals to actually climb
for players who are under the cloud of suspicion. Don’t get me wrong: I don’t think Barry Bonds will ever earn
enough votes (which is a crime), but as the list of players suspected of
juicing continues to grow, I predict that out of sheer pragmatism, some of the
writers will relax their position and cast for players they had previously
overlooked.
What does my ballot look like? The current rules allow for
voters to cast for as many as 10 eligible candidates. While the idea of 10 players joining manager
inductees Tony LaRussa, Bobby Cox and Joe Torre on stage makes for one long
awards ceremony, my ballot has 10 names on it. You already know about Bonds and Clemens, and
4 new names on the ballot that will have my checkmark next to them (Glavine,
Maddux, Mussina, Thomas). Here are the
other 4:
Craig
Biggio - One of my
favorite ballplayers. A career similar
to Roberto Alomar (HOF 2010), not as flashy with the glove, a little more pop
with the bat. Bobby Grich has a higher career WAR (Wins Above Replacement) total
than Craig Biggio, and you shouldn’t have to say that about any 1st ballot Hall
of Famer, which is why I left him off my mythical ballot a year ago, but other
than Charlie Hustle himself, there are no Hall of Famers with more career hits
than Biggio (3,060) not in the Hall.
Mike
Piazza - 427 bombs
highest among all catchers, higher WAR total than Yogi Berra and Bill Dickey.
He should have been in on the first ballot.
Don’t over think this one.
Tim
Raines - Raines is
another guy who’s been overlooked for a few years, but whose fine career looks
even better through a sabermetric lens. Only Bonds and Pete Rose are left
fielders whose WAR totals are higher than Raines. Stole 980 bags and that
number may NEVER be matched again.
Alan
Trammell - Passed over
by the writers for 12 straight years, Trammell is one I have changed my mind on
quite recently. There are only two
shortstops with higher career WAR totals than Trammell’s: Alex Rodriguez and Derek Jeter. Tram went
about his business very quietly in the Motor City, but his distinguished career
is worthy of enshrinement.





No comments:
Post a Comment